Last Updated on Thursday, 04 December 2014 12:35
Ohio Citizens PAC Supports Actions by Ohio Senate
Asks House to Follow Through
Akron, OH - The Ohio Citizens PAC came out today to support two initiatives by the Ohio Senate. The group supports Ohio House Bill 5, which brings some much needed reform to Ohio's burdensome and overly complicated Municipal Tax system, and Senate President Keith Faber's Ballot Issue Plan On Pay Raises. HB 5 passed the Ohio Senate on Wednesday and the Ohio Citizens PAC is urging all Ohio House members to vote to pass it this week so that the Governor can sign it into law before the end of the year. The Pay Raise Ballot Issue (SB9) is being fast tracked and was referred to the State Government Oversight & Reform Committee before going to the House.
In announcing it's support, the organization's President, Tom Zawistowski, said "While HB 5 has been through a multi-year gauntlet, during which municipalities have managed to remove many reforms that are still needed, the bill is still a small step in the right direction. However much more needs to be done as was outlined in the recentBuckeye Institute white paper
released November 6, 2014. The dirty little secret in Ohio is that we are not one of the highest tax states in the nation because of state taxes, but because of the 6,400 local taxing agencies that take $4 billion out of Ohio tax payers pockets each year. Often through double taxation schemes and onerous penalties and fees from employers who fail to navigate the convoluted and confusing tax landscape. This hurts small business employers and stifles job creation. We urge the House to pass this bill and then do more in the next session."
Zawistowski added "Our organization and all Ohio tax payers should be against the Stebelton pay raise bill in the Ohio House, which pretty much just gives every state employee a 3% raise. The Faber Pay Raise Ballot Issue (SB9) is a much more fair and reasoned approach to the problem. While there is no way to completely take politics out of the mix, this bill strikes the right balance of having citizen involvement with the process with some legislative oversight. We expect it to clear the Senate and we will encourage House members to approve it."
Zawistowski identified one more Senate action of interest by saying "One bill we have our eye on, and will be watching in the Senate, is House Bill 175 by Representative DoVilla which attempts to codify the "Open Checkbook
" iniative implemented by Ohio Treasure Josh Mandel. This effort by Mandel far exceeded our expectations as far as providing transparency for every dollar that the State of Ohio spends and we congratulate Treasure Mandel and his staff for this effort. We understand that the Governor's office is working against the DeVitis bill in the Senate and we hope that Ohio's Senators will vote for the people of Ohio and make sure that these type of online tools will always be available from the Ohio Treasures office."
Zawistowski concluded by saying "We are obviously still hoping for action on the Heartbeat Bill, Common Core repeal and the American Laws for American Courts bill and will keep pushing them. All of these initiatives have overwhelming support among Ohio voters and yet special interest manage to keep our Representatives from keeping their campaign promises and acting in the best interest of the voters. I can only assure them that they should pass all of these initiative now, because we are not going away until they are passed, either by those we elected to the next House and Senate or by people we elect who will replace them in the House and Senate in 2016."
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 December 2014 12:51
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
December 16, 2014
Contact: Charles Tassell
Citizens for Community Values Action is deeply concerned about the potential leadership choices for the Ohio State House.
PROPOSED STATE HOUSE LEADERSHIP RAISES DEEP CONCERNS OVER VALUES
Our research into the voting record of some of the Representatives proposed for the leadership team, rightfully raises questions about their qualifications for leadership roles. Their voting records should also cause concerns for many elected House members who ran as conservatives in the November election, particularly if they ran as social-conservatives.
We, and our members, would certainly expect Representatives to vote for a leadership team that represents their values as well as the values of their district, particularly those who were endorsed by Citizens for Community Values Action PAC.
Barbara Sears (R 47):
Supporting abortion language in Medicaid expansion,
Opposed to Common Core Reform,
Co-sponsoring Needle Exchange language,
Opposed Pro-life legislation.
Dorothy Pelanda (R-86):
Support of Sexual Orientation Rights, HB 163
Sponsored Sexual orientation language for HB 624
Supporting abortion language in Medicaid expansion,
Opposed gateway sex-ed,
No pro-life endorsement.
"We encourage all Ohio Citizens concerned with values to speak with their representative-elect and discuss voting on House-leadership based on their votes, positions, and values. In addition, we encourage Representatives to vote their conscience, and their campaign promises." stated Charles Tassell, Vice President of Citizens for Community Values Action.
CCV Action, the non-profit and tax-exempt legislative action arm of Citizens for Community Values
was founded in 2004 to promote the common good and general welfare, primarily by means of education and direct and grassroots lobbying in support of laws and protect the sanctity of human life, marriage and the family, and which are consistent with principles of good government.
CCV Action is a 501(c)(4), non-profit education and lobbying organization based in Cincinnati, OH and is dedicated to preserving and advancing the interests of family, faith, and freedom in the political arena.
CCV Action seeks to fortify the traditional foundations of civil society through efforts to educate, inform and influence elected officials in support of the country's historic ideals of equality under the law, and the unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness on which the nation was founded.
Last Updated on Monday, 19 January 2015 10:20
From: Ohio Citizens PAC <
Subject: Congratulations on Speakership
Date: January 9, 2015 4:10:35 PM EST
To: Cliff Rosenberger
Dear Speaker Rosenberger,
I am writing to congratulate you on your election as Speaker of the Ohio House. I understand in Cincinnati today that you emphatically stated that you were not "the Governor's man" and that you would make your own decisions as Speaker. I assure you that I will be the first to send out a Press Release praising you as a man of your word, when we see you actually stand up to the Governor on an important issue like Common Core, Religious Freedom, the Severance Tax, etc.
Let me also say that, while those in the political class clearly have no idea what I or the TEA Party movement are about, I can assure you that all we want from you as Speaker is for the voices of our duly elected Representatives to be heard in the People's House. Conservative or liberal, Democrat or Republican, majority or minority, they all deserve to be heard and to have the chance to make their case for the people in their district. They many not have the money or the political clout to win their point, which is another issue all together, but by God you as Speaker can at least insure that they get to make it. All to often in recent memory that has not been the case. It is our sincere hope that the Ohio House under your leadership will not be the "Siberian Death Camp" it has been in the past for all those Republicans and Democrats who dared to have their own views, ideas and opinions that do no agree with the Governor's.
Governor Kasich just warned Republicans in December by saying "I'm going to have a whole lot more to say to those who stand in my way." We will see if you as House Speaker can get through the Governor's thin skin that it is not about his way and help him understand that there is no "my way" in Representative Government. Everyone has a right to participate, not just take orders. If you can accomplish that you will truly be one of great Speakers in Ohio History. We are hoping and praying that will be the case. All the best to you and your team.
OHIO Citizens PAC
P.O. Box 6211
Akron, OH 44312
Last Updated on Monday, 05 January 2015 12:05
Controversy over House Speaker Vote Continues
Not one Represenative Willing to Admit Voting for Rosenberger in "Secret Poll"
Akron, OH - The controversy over next Monday's, January 5, 2015, vote for Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives continues as not one Representative is willing to admit to their constituents that they intend to vote for the announced “secret” straw poll winner Cliff Rosenberger from Cincinnati. Several supporters of challenger Jim Butler have filled out and returned the Ohio Citizen PAC House Speaker survey. While citizens all over the state have been asking Representatives to explain who they intend to vote for and why, few have been willing to disclose this information to their constituents. Leading many to question “if those votes were not coerced through threats and bribes, why is no one willing to proudly stand and say that they support Rosenberger and explain why he is the best choice?” Reports continue to come in indicating that the Governor is choosing the new House Speaker and that Representatives are concerned about political retribution if they do not support the Governor’s man Cliff Rosenberger.
Leon Neisius from Fairfield County reported that “I spent almost two hours two days ago with Tim Schaffer, who will be the new House Representative for the Northern part of Fairfield County (district 77). I asked him who he voted for the House Speaker and he said they were in caucus and he could not reveal. He did not say much except to make some remarks to the effect that the Governor's men got involved.”
Chuck Laughlin from Lake County reported that he talked to Ron Young (R-61), a veteran of the Ohio House, and Young indicted that if he did not vote for Roseberger “he would lose his chance at a chairmanship and wouldn't get any consideration on any legislation for his district.”
Gary Woodburn from Zanesville said “I have mailed (the) survey form to my representative Brian Hill (R-97) 3 times (twice by certified mail) and phoned his office. He has not responded.” In his letter to Representative Hill, Mr. Woodburn asks his Representative if his vote for Speaker on January 5, 2015 will be consistent with Republican Values and raises the concerns about the values and voting record of the proposed Leadership team that were raised by Citizens for Community Values Action about Representatives Barbara Sears and Dorothy Pelanda. He refuses to answer.
Tom Zawistowski, President of the Ohio Citizens PAC, said “The total lack of transparency among our elected representative concerning what is in fact the most critical vote any of them will make in the next two years is reprehensible. Particularly in light of the shameful actions of the outgoing Speaker Bill Batchelder in the lame duck session before the holidays. In a move reeking of irony, Speaker Batchelder single handedly killed the Heartbeat Bill by intentionally failing to recognize Representative Matt Lynch who was attempting to make a motion to lawfully attach the Heartbeat Bill to another bill that ultimately passed and became law. A young Representative Bathchelder in 1983 was so outraged by Democrat Speaker Vern Riffe doing the same thing to him that he wore a dog muzzle on the House floor! Now as one of his final acts as Speaker, as Republican Speaker, he intentionally denied a Republican Representative his right to lawfully act in the interest of the citizens in his district and this state who support the Heartbeat Bill.
Furthermore, the same day, he used a parliamentary procedure to deny Representative John Adams the same right to attach a bill repealing CommonCore to another bill, even though most Republicans in the Ohio House ran on a platform opposed to the implementation of CommonCore in Ohio. The Governor wants CommonCore and Batchelder followed orders to the very end. Why would any Representative vote to continue this tyranny by the Governor, vote to give up their right to represent the views and values of their constituents, unless they were forced to do so?”
Zawistowski concluded “The outrageous and shameful actions of Speaker Batchelder demonstrate how important it is to have a co-equal independent Ohio House of Representatives as required by the Ohio Constitution. A place where all citizens can have their views represented. Instead it is clear, that the vast majority of our Representative’s first act, after swearing an oath to uphold the Ohio Constitution, will be to violate that oath, by giving into the threats and bribes of the Governor’s agents and allowing the Governor to dictate to them that they must vote for Cliff Rosenberger or face political retribution. Thus, dooming the House to the undignified role of simply being a rubber stamp for the Governor’s agenda for the next two years regardless of the wishes of the citizens they represent. This is what is wrong with government and what citizens hate about government. The action on January 5, 2015 by our “Representatives” will confirm that our government is a fraud, that it does not work for the people, but only for the powerful and politically connected. We in fact have NO Representation. Therefore we have no choice but to act to protect our Constitutional rights by changing the system and those within the system. We look forward to recruiting 2016 primary challengers for all those who vote for Rosenberger. What better platform to run on than the fact that the incumbent refused to uphold the Ohio Constitution and in his/her first vote they voted for a leadership team that goes against the very values that they ran on to get elected?”
Last Updated on Tuesday, 16 December 2014 18:19
For immediate release
December 10, 2014
Republicans ask Ohio GOP to adopt Republican National Platform
Columbus, OH - What do Ohio Republicans stand for? What are their moral and social values? If we elect them, what type of legislation will they pass? What can we expect if we recruit, work for, and elect Republicans? To what standards do we hold our Republican representatives?
All of this should be defined in the Ohio Republican Party platform, if they had one.
Years ago, the Ohio GOP dropped their platform and has been running on "We need to elect more Republicans."
At last Friday's Republican State Central Committee (SCC) meeting, when Chairman Borges asked for any new Business, Lisa Cooper (SCC-26) spoke up and asked that the Ohio GOP adopt the RNC platform as their own.
Watch entire meeting (HERE)
Lisa and several others had made 66 copies of the 62 page platform and had placed it on each representatives seat. (Read RNC 2012 platform HERE)
Several other SCC spoke as to the importance of having a platform that voters could refer to and gain knowledge as to what the party stood for.
Gary Burkholder (SCC-31) read the following paragraph from the RNC platform:
We respectfully submit this platform to the American people. It is both a vision of where we are headed and an invitation to join us in that journey. It is about the great dreams and opportunities that have always been America and must remain the essence of America for generations to come.
RNC Platform Table of Contents
• Restoring the American Dream: Rebuilding the Economy and Creating jobs
• We the People: A Restoration of Constitutional Government
• Americas Natural Resources: Energy, Agriculture and the Environment
• Reforming Government to Serve the People
• Renewing American Values to build Healthy Families, Great Schools and safe neighborhoods
• American Exceptionalism|
The Ohio GOP SCC reps voted to move the platform to the Policy Committee. We are urging all Ohio Republicans to call, write, or meet with your SCC members and ask them to adopt this platform. If they agree with the adoption, please ask them to call one or two of the members on the Policy Committee to let them know their thoughts. It would also be helpful if all Republicans would call 2 - 3 members on the Policy Committee to let them know WHY you think the platform is important to Ohio’s future. Think outside the box on how this could help with voter turnout, donations, 2016 results, candidate recruitment, etc.
CONTACT YOUR REPUBLICAN PARTY STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE
Several years ago, the Ohio Republican party removed all contact information from their web site, making it virtually impossible for Republicans to find or contact their SCC Representative.
We urge the Ohio GOP to place this information back on the Ohio GOP web site.
In the interim, we have published the following contact information for SCC members. Be aware that there may be inaccurate information, but it’s the best we could do without assistance from the Ohio GOP.
You can find the contact list in PDF and Excel format at Your Name on the Ballot
CONTACT MEMBERS OF THE POLICY COMMITTEE
Contact your SCC member AND - Contact each of these members on the Policy Committee. The Ohio GOP needs a Platform. We need to tell new Republican voters what we stand for, what we strive for, and what our values and goals are.
When we recruit and support candidates for office, they should understand the platform, and run on adherence to that platform.
When our elected Representatives take office, they should conduct our business with the platform in mi9nd. We should hold our elected officials accountable to this platform.
Call each of these members of the
Mary Ann Christie
Call as many of these as you can, explain your concern about the Ohio Republican Party not having a Platform, and the need to adopt one similar in nature and scope to the RNC platform.
Last Updated on Monday, 01 December 2014 12:21
Brinkman, Vitale and Zeltwanger Join Growing List
of Ohio House Members Returning Leadership Vote Survey
Akron, OH - The Ohio Citizens PAC announce today that Representatives Tom Brinkman from the 27th House District, Nino Vitale from the 82nd House District and Paul Zeltwanger from the 54th House District joined Representative John Becker from the 65th House District in returning the Leadership Vote Survey being distributed by Ohio Liberty Group members before the official January 5, 2015 vote for the new Speaker of the Ohio House. All returned survey's can be viewed on the www.OhioCitizensPAC.org
website where voters can also get a copy of the survey to give to their Ohio House members to fill out and return to them.
Tom Zawistowski, President of the Ohio Citizens PAC, said "The purpose of the survey is both simple and incredibly important. Governor John Kasich is attempting to unlawfully control both the Ohio House and the Executive Branch by using bribes, intimidation and threats of retaliation, to force the election of Cliff Rosenberger as House Speaker, whom he controls. This effort by the Governor has one purpose and that is to control not only what bills get passed in the Ohio House over the next four years, but to go so far as to control what bills are even debated in the people's House. This act, takes away from Ohio voters, particularly Republican voters, their Constitutional right to have their values, and views and policy preferences REPRESENTED during policy debates by their duly elected Representative in the Ohio House. If the Governor succeeds in this power grab, issues important to Ohio voters such as Common Core, Medicaid Expansion, Photo Voter ID, American Laws for American Courts and the Heartbeat Bill, will never see the light of day. Despite their overwhelming 60%+ support in polls and the fact that nearly EVERY Republican House member who won ran on those issues. That is just wrong and every citizen needs to contact their Ohio House member to demand that they not give in to the Governor."
Zawistowski concluded by saying "In November, Ohio voters elected an unprecedented super majority of 65 "Republicans" to the 99 member Ohio House. Those they elected should now represent the values and policy views that they ran on and were elected to follow when they vote for the new Speaker of the House. The Ohio Citizens PAC Leadership Vote Survey asks Representatives to disclose who they voted for as the new Speaker in the secret straw poll conducted after the election and why they voted for that person to be the third most powerful political official in the State. It also ask that they declare that their official vote in January will be consistent with the separation of powers required in the Ohio Constitution and the policy positions that each Representative ran on in November. We urge Ohio's citizens to defend their Constitutional right to be represented in the Ohio House by demanding that the representative they elected fill out a copy of the survey, which they can get atwww.OhioCitizensPAC.org
, and have them return it before the January 5, 2015 vote."
Last Updated on Thursday, 27 November 2014 10:15
Republican Control = Money Grab?
As the lame duck session comes to an end, there may be more to what is going on in Columbus than meets the eye. A friend of mine called yesterday to ask if we had seen Thomas Suddes’s article in the Columbus Dispatch on the raises our fiscally responsible Representitives were getting ready to vote for themselves. It’s a good article:
But now here is “The Rest of the Story”
HB No. 661 not only gives our State Representitives a raise, but also extends a hand (from your pocket) to “statewide elected executive officers; to increase the compensation of justices and judges of the courts, county elected officials, township trustees and fiscal officers, and board of elections members”.
It does this by giving straight raises, and by re-instituting a “cost of living” adjustment based on the rate of 3% or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower. In some cases…….
To read the bill go here: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=130_HB_661 .
You might want to take a look down the left side and read “Bill Analyses”, and while you are doing this, remind yourself that we voted in a Republican Governor, Senate, and House of Representatives on a fiscal conservative platform. And check out the raises for our judges (5%) and other county elected officials.
Perhaps we would be a little less incensed if the way our representatives went about giving themselves pay raises was based on “merit” vs. a “money grab”:. After all, as Republicans don’t we feel that our teachers and educators need to be based on a merit based program? As a matter of fact, isn’t Representative Gerald Stebelton (Sponsor of HB 661) on record for pushing hard for merit based pay for school districts?
“We need to face the reality that there are teachers that are less qualified than other teachers,” Stebelton said. “They’re not as well-trained—they’re not as good in teaching—and having the same salary schedule for a second grade teacher who is not a good teacher and the one who is an excellent teacher is not fair to the one who is an excellent teacher.”
Is everyone in the employ of the tax payer of equal quality? Is a new State Representative or new State Senator, trustee, fiscal officer, etc. of equal stature to one that has been in place and trained over an extended period of time?
And in all honesty, if we want fiscal restraint, local control, and smaller government, what the hell is the state doing mandating what we pay our local county officials? That needs to be in our hands, not the hands of the State!
One other small point – there are lots of little “extras” that go with the pay scale that are called “Position Supplements” – its amazing! These are given with chair and other special positions, and can be as much as $10,000.00. They are handed out by leadership – not by merit, but more like “Atta Boys” for towing the party line. But my favorite part of the bill? The most special part of this hypocrisy (and keep in mind most of these guys work part time) is the penalty for NOT showing up to work. The best estimates I have seen put the salary of a State Representative at about $400 per day (without all the position supplements and special extras). The penalty for not showing up is $20.00. Work your way up HB 661 from there, and you will begin to understand why so few show up to vote anymore, and why so many of us are just getting angrier by the day. Fiscal Conservative Republicans? Perhaps thats an “Oxymoron” in Columbus these days?
Last Updated on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 20:04
For Immediate Release: May 7, 2014
Ohio Citizens PAC Candidates win Five House Races
Achieves other Major Goals
Akron, OH - Tuesday, in the 2014 Primary Elections, candidates endorsed by the Ohio Citizens PAC won five (5) Ohio House races as well as state central committee, county central committee and many local races. This despite ORP assurances that the TEA Party would not win any races in the primary. In the 27th House District Tom Brinkman defeated Peter Stautberg 57-43%; in the 54th House District Paul Zeltwanger won a three way race by getting 51%; in the 75th House District Nick Skeriotis defeated Kenneth Hendrickson 67-33%, in the 79th House District Kyle Koehler won a three way race with 54% of the vote and in the 85th House District Nino Vitale won a three way race with 54% of the vote. None of the seven OCP endorsed candidates for Senate were able to win their primary. The OCP can not endorse in Federal races, but did endorse in two congressional races through the We the People Convention under Citizens United. Richard May won his primary against Robert Horrocks 72-28%, while Matt Lynch lost to Dave Joyce 45-55%.
Tom Zawistowski, President of the Ohio Citizens PAC, said "We are so proud of our candidates, their volunteers and supporters. Tuesday was the culmination of a new effort that started for us just five months ago in December. That is when we decided that we would never get the governance we seek until we can elect people who we chose to represent us and are not controlled by monied special interests. To do that we needed to develop new competencies, because we had no real experience recruiting candidates and running campaigns or winning elections. So, we decided to start with a very small first step, we simply asked people to put their name on the ballot. At the time we were told by the "experts" and the political establishment that we would not get five people run for office. Instead we got 68 to run for state office and hundreds more to run for county and local offices. The Ohio Republican Party assured the media as recently as Sunday that the TEA Party would not win any races. Winning five House races is a pretty amazing achievement, particularly when you are outspent 20-1 or more. We are proud of all our candidates because they had the courage to put their name on the ballot and give citizens a choice when few others would do the same."
Zawistowski concluded by saying, "What this effort is about is trying to find a way to reclaim the electoral process from the monied special interests, on both sides, so that we can restore representative government to the people. We took a major step toward doing that Tuesday by successfully recruiting candidates, learning the hard way how to run a campaign, and actually electing people that the establishment party did not pick or finance. This is just the start for us. Many of those candidates will be running again in future elections and we will recruit many more for future elections. Overall, it was a great day in Ohio for the TEA Party. The only disappointment was the lack of primary challengers in both the Democratic and Republican Primaries overall, which is what the establishment parties want, and the horrible turnout of just 16.65%. Which is a direct reflection of that lack of choice and the overall disgust with the political process by citizens - which no one understands better than those of us who are directly confronting the political establishment of both parties."
Last Updated on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 16:05
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Friday, November 14, 2014
Media Spin of Kasich Win in Ohio Distorts the Facts
Akron, OH - Tom Zawistowski, President of the Ohio Citizens PAC, today rejected the spin the media is putting on the re-election of Ohio Governor John Kasich, prompted by Kasich and his staff, as a distortion of the facts. Kasich won re-election by a 31% margin and won in 86 of Ohio's 88 counties. He and his team are trying to use the results, such as their winning "69% of Independent Voters, 60% of Women Voters, and 57% of Young Voters", to suggest that Kasich could be a viable republican candidate for President in 2016.
Commenting on the Governors “race” Zawistowski said “Here are the facts that the media is leaving out of their post election reports of what actually happened in Ohio. As the chart below shows, nearly a million more Ohioans stayed home this year compared with 2010 - 3,956,045 vs 3,010,760 - because the voters are not stupid and they knew they had no real choice for governor. This year Kasich ran virtually unopposed, due to his nefarious actions, and had 18 times the cash, $20 million compared with $4.6 million for FitzGerald, yet he only attracted a measly 33,000 more votes than he got in 2010. Which shows that his popularity is not what he claims. Furthermore, 88,000 Ohioans voted and left the Governor's choice blank, more than his margin of victory in 2010. In his two elections for governor, Kasich has yet to attract even 25% of the votes in the state - having had only 23.5% of voters vote for him in 2010 and only 24.81% in 2014. Hardly a mandate. Kasich did not get people to vote for him, he only got people to not vote at all and stay home. If they would not vote for him this year, they would not come out to vote for him for president in 2016, they would come out to vote against him."
Zawistowski concluded, "
We just had an election for Governor in which not one issue was discussed. Not one debate was held about the actual state of the Ohio economy and our future direction. Despite Kasich's dubious claims of economic growth
Ohio is 44th in the nation in job growth, we are still 200,000 jobs down from where we were when the bottom fell out. We haven't even recovered let alone grown jobs and Kasich is just blowing smoke about how everyone is doing great. Does anyone believe that Kasich could win Ohio in a presidential race when Barack Obama got over 1,000,000 more votes in 2012 than Kasich did in 2014 running without any credible Democratic campaign or money against him? Particularly after alienating the conservative base with his liberal first term record as indicated in the chart below? Like we said before this election, not only would conservatives not vote for John Kasich for president, we would not work for him as a presidential candidate and he can't win if we don't. He would not have won re-election this year if he had not bribed the democrats
and kept other candidates off the ballot. What he did to win re-election this year will not work in a presidential election.”
Last Updated on Sunday, 23 November 2014 12:04
Kasich Immigration stance shows he is a Progressive not a Conservative . . .
By Julie Aldrich, Ohio Citizens for Sensible Immigration
Kasich's immigration views "evolved" and he could not even wait until the month was out AFTER the ELECTION to tell the Ohio voters! Ohioans who have worked on the illegal immigration issue have known where he stands even though his staff members would tell us differently. So many requests were made to speak with him on the issue, but we were never given the opportunity. We delivered thousands of Ohio signatures to ask him to take a stand against illegal immigration, no response.
The governor never did anything to stop illegal aliens from receiving drivers' licenses and in-state tuition after Obama passed another executive order for illegal aliens giving some DACA status. Rep. Lynch had entered two bills to stop driver's licenses and in-state tuition going to illegal alien (DACA'S) and they never went past sponsor testimony in committee. Sen. Seitz had a bill to stop illegal aliens from receiving workers' compensation - still sitting in committee. Raises given to the Ohio Hispanic Commission, who has fought every bill for illegal alien enforcement measures and spent most of their time and our tax dollars working for illegal aliens; raises to this commission - but stripped funding from our local government and schools. OCHLA has had the ear of our dear governor and attorney general, supporting expanded Medicaid and common core. How convenient that the governor announces his evolvement on illegal immigration after his victory as governor and before his run for president. We are soon to be the next California.
There is no compassion is selling out your constituents, reaping what they have sown- to pass on to those who have broken laws, through taxes. We have evolved enough as citizens to decide who we wish to help with charity and when we can afford it. The governor apparently does not realize many Ohio citizens have had their health care rates nearly double in a short time, many to lose their homes - so he can feel compassionate redistributing your tax dollars to those he chooses, many of them here illegally. I would not call that very compassionate.
Kasich’s immigration views ‘evolved’
BOCA RATON, Fla. — A little more than four years ago, John Kasich told The Dispatch, “One thing that I don’t want to reward is illegal immigration.”
He called for a comprehensive federal immigration law protecting America’s borders. And he reiterated his longtime support for amending the U.S. Constitution to end birthright citizenship for children born here to illegal immigrants.
But now, as his fellow Republican governors loudly voice many of the same sentiments, Kasich is urging them to ratchet down the rhetoric and try to work with President Barack Obama to solve one of the nation’s longstanding vexing problems.
Hours before Obama outlined executive action that could grant a reprieve from deportation for millions now in the country illegally, Kasich conceded that his own stance on immigration has “ evolved” because he is “maybe a little smarter now.”
“The country needs healing,” he said. “I wouldn’t ever be one to tell you that I don’t change my mind or that my thinking doesn’t evolve. … I’m also a different guy than I was years ago. This job grows you up.”
He was the only governor during the Republican Governors Association’s conference this week to express openly a willingness to create a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
“I don’t want to see anybody in pain,” Kasich said. “So I guess when I look at this now, I look at it differently than I did in ’10. Because I’ve become convinced that sometimes, you just got to say this is what we’re gonna do and if you don’t like it, there’s nothing I can help you.”
In contrast to what he said a month before he won the governor’s office in 2010, Kasich sounded a note of compassion for those struggling to make a new life in America. He noted that his wife had a friend who was forced to return to Nicaragua, and there was nothing he could do about it.
“So when I look at a group of people who might be hiding, who may be afraid, who may be scared, who have children, I don’t want to be in a position of where I make it worse for them,” he said.
In response to questions, Kasich said he didn’t know whether Ohio will have to act on such issues as driver’s licenses, Medicaid services or in-state college tuition in response to Obama’s action tonight.
The governor also said he hasn’t thought about whether Ohio would join a lawsuit threatened by Wisconsin Gov. Walker and outgoing Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
“You have to have dialogue in this country with people who may not think exactly the way you think,” Kasich said.
He did criticize Obama for acting unilaterally rather than reaching out to Republicans, who increased their majority in the U.S. House and took control of the Senate in this month’s election.
“When you do this, you really create such antipathy,” Kasich said. “We really can’t move forward as a country. … When we become so divided, it gets harder.”