Welcome to The Portage County Ohio TEA Party

Totally Engaged Americans

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home National / World News

National and World News

TEA Party vs Occupy Wall Street

E-mail Print PDF

 

Which one represents the America you want to live in, and have your children and grandchildren raised in?

 

The Democrats have said that the Occupy Party was their answer to and "just like" the Tea Party.

 

REPORTED

OCCUPY PARTY

TEA PARTY

ARRESTS

4149+

0

DEATHS

7

0

RAPES

12

0

ARSON DAMAGE

$10,000,000.00

$0

PUBLIC DEFECATION

YES

NO

ANTISEMITIC RANTS

12

0

COST TO TAXPAYERS (11/9)

$19,327,487..00+

$0

PUBLIC MASTURBATION

3

0

MOLOTOV COCKTAILS THROWN

10

0

FIGHTS STARTED

YES

NO

CHILDREN EXPLOITED

YES

NO

POLICE CARS DAMAGED

2

0

PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS

YES

NO

DRUG POSSESSION ARREST

YES

NO

CONCEALED WEAPON ARREST

YES

NO

DRUG OVERDOSE

YES

NO

THEFTS

YES

NO

BURGLARIES

YES

NO

VANDALISM ARREST

YES

NO

TRESPASSING ARREST

YES

NO

NON FATAL SHOOTINGS

1

0

PUBLIC URINATION

YES

NO

URINATION ON OTHERS

YES

NO

ISRAELI FLAGS BURNED

2

0

AMERICAN FLAGS BURNED

1

0

AMERICAN FLAGS DANCED ON

1

0

AMERICAN FLAGS DESECRATION

25

0

FELONY ASSAULT ON AN EMT

1

0

HEAD/BODY LICE OUTBREAKS

1

0

TUBERCULOSIS OUTBREAKS

1

0

MURDER

1

0

SUICIDE

1

0

 

 

 

SHOTS FIRED AT WHITE HOUSE

1

0

SCABIES OUTBREAKS

1

0

OBAMA ENDORSED

YES

NO

PELOSI ENDORSED

YES

NO

CAIR ENDORSED

YES

NO

SOCIALIST PARTY ENDORSED

YES

NO

NAZI PARTY ENDORSED

YES

NO

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ENDORSED

YES

NO

COMMUNIST PARTY ENDORSED

YES

NO

BIDEN ENDORSED

YES

NO

HUGO CHAVEZ ENDORSED

YES

NO

BLACK PANTHERS ENDORSED

YES

NO

HEZBOLLAH ENDORSED

YES

NO

MARXIST UNION ENDORSED

YES

NO

9/11 TRUTHER ENDORSED

YES

NO

BOLSHEVIK ENDORSED

YES

NO

IRAN GOVERNMENT ENDORSED

YES

NO

AYATOLLAH ENDORSED

YES

NO

NORTH KOREA ENDORSED

YES

NO

FARRAKHAN ENDORSED

YES

NO

NATION OF ISLAM ENDORSED

YES

NO

AND LET’S NOT FORGET… COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IS GIVING COLLEGE CREDITS TO PEOPLE WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE OWS DEMONSTRATIONS BUT NOT THE TEA PARTY.

 

Presidential Executive Order Released

E-mail Print PDF

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/03/16/executive-order-national-defense-resources-preparedness

EXECUTIVE ORDER

NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

PART I  -  PURPOSE, POLICY, AND IMPLEMENTATION

Section 101.  Purpose.  This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the "Act").

Sec102.  Policy.  The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency.  The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness.  The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.

Sec103.  General Functions.  Executive departments and agencies (agencies) responsible for plans and programs relating to national defense (as defined in section 801(j) of this order), or for resources and services needed to support such plans and programs, shall:

(a)  identify requirements for the full spectrum of emergencies, including essential military and civilian demand;

(b)  assess on an ongoing basis the capability of the domestic industrial and technological base to satisfy requirements in peacetime and times of national emergency, specifically evaluating the availability of the most critical resource and production sources, including subcontractors and suppliers, materials, skilled labor, and professional and technical personnel;

(c)  be prepared, in the event of a potential threat to the security of the United States, to take actions necessary to ensure the availability of adequate resources and production capability, including services and critical technology, for national defense requirements;

(d)  improve the efficiency and responsiveness of the domestic industrial base to support national defense requirements; and

(e)  foster cooperation between the defense and commercial sectors for research and development and for acquisition of materials, services, components, and equipment to enhance industrial base efficiency and responsiveness.

Sec104.  Implementation.  (a)  The National Security Council and Homeland Security Council, in conjunction with the National Economic Council, shall serve as the integrated policymaking forum for consideration and formulation of national defense resource preparedness policy and shall make recommendations to the President on the use of authorities under the Act.

(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall:

(1)  advise the President on issues of national defense resource preparedness and on the use of the authorities and functions delegated by this order;

(2)  provide for the central coordination of the plans and programs incident to authorities and functions delegated under this order, and provide guidance to agencies assigned functions under this order, developed in consultation with such agencies; and

(3)  report to the President periodically concerning all program activities conducted pursuant to this order.

(c)  The Defense Production Act Committee, described in section 701 of this order, shall:

(1)  in a manner consistent with section 2(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2062(b), advise the President through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy on the effective use of the authorities under the Act; and

(2)  prepare and coordinate an annual report to the Congress pursuant to section 722(d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171(d).

(d)  The Secretary of Commerce, in cooperation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and other agencies, shall:

(1)  analyze potential effects of national emergencies on actual production capability, taking into account the entire production system, including shortages of resources, and develop recommended preparedness measures to strengthen capabilities for production increases in national emergencies; and

(2)  perform industry analyses to assess capabilities of the industrial base to support the national defense, and develop policy recommendations to improve the international competitiveness of specific domestic industries and their abilities to meet national defense program needs.

PART II  -  PRIORITIES AND ALLOCATIONS

Sec201.  Priorities and Allocations Authorities.  (a)  The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

(1)  the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

(2)  the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

(3)  the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

(4)  the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

(5)  the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

(6)  the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

(b)  The Secretary of each agency delegated authority under subsection (a) of this section (resource departments) shall plan for and issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources and establish standards and procedures by which the authority shall be used to promote the national defense, under both emergency and non-emergency conditions.  Each Secretary shall authorize the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, to place priority ratings on contracts and orders for materials, services, and facilities needed in support of programs approved under section 202 of this order.

(c)  Each resource department shall act, as necessary and appropriate, upon requests for special priorities assistance, as defined by section 801(l) of this order, in a time frame consistent with the urgency of the need at hand.  In situations where there are competing program requirements for limited resources, the resource department shall consult with the Secretary who made the required determination under section 202 of this order.  Such Secretary shall coordinate with and identify for the resource department which program requirements to prioritize on the basis of operational urgency.  In situations involving more than one Secretary making such a required determination under section 202 of this order, the Secretaries shall coordinate with and identify for the resource department which program requirements should receive priority on the basis of operational urgency.

(d)  If agreement cannot be reached between two such Secretaries, then the issue shall be referred to the President through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.

(e)  The Secretary of each resource department, when necessary, shall make the finding required under section 101(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(b).  This finding shall be submitted for the President's approval through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism.  Upon such approval, the Secretary of the resource department that made the finding may use the authority of section 101(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(a), to control the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market.

Sec202.  Determinations.  Except as provided in section 201(e) of this order, the authority delegated by section 201 of this order may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense:

(a)  by the Secretary of Defense with respect to military production and construction, military assistance to foreign nations, military use of civil transportation, stockpiles managed by the Department of Defense, space, and directly related activities;

(b)  by the Secretary of Energy with respect to energy production and construction, distribution and use, and directly related activities; and

(c)  by the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to all other national defense programs, including civil defense and continuity of Government.

Sec203.  Maximizing Domestic Energy Supplies.  The authorities of the President under section 101(c)(1) (2) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(c)(1) (2), are delegated to the Secretary of Commerce, with the exception that the authority to make findings that materials (including equipment), services, and facilities are critical and essential, as described in section 101(c)(2)(A) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(c)(2)(A), is delegated to the Secretary of Energy.

Sec204.  Chemical and Biological Warfare.  The authority of the President conferred by section 104(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2074(b), is delegated to the Secretary of Defense.  This authority may not be further delegated by the Secretary.

PART III  -  EXPANSION OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY AND SUPPLY

Sec301.  Loan Guarantees.  (a)  To reduce current or projected shortfalls of resources, critical technology items, or materials essential for the national defense, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense, as defined in section 801(h) of this order, is authorized pursuant to section 301 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, to guarantee loans by private institutions.

(b)  Each guaranteeing agency is designated and authorized to:  (1) act as fiscal agent in the making of its own guarantee contracts and in otherwise carrying out the purposes of section 301 of the Act; and (2) contract with any Federal Reserve Bank to assist the agency in serving as fiscal agent.

(c)  Terms and conditions of guarantees under this authority shall be determined in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  The guaranteeing agency is authorized, following such consultation, to prescribe:  (1) either specifically or by maximum limits or otherwise, rates of interest, guarantee and commitment fees, and other charges which may be made in connection with such guarantee contracts; and (2) regulations governing the forms and procedures (which shall be uniform to the extent practicable) to be utilized in connection therewith.

Sec302.  Loans.  To reduce current or projected shortfalls of resources, critical technology items, or materials essential for the national defense, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 302 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2092, to make loans thereunder.  Terms and conditions of loans under this authority shall be determined in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of OMB.

Sec303.  Additional Authorities.  (a)  To create, maintain, protect, expand, or restore domestic industrial base capabilities essential for the national defense, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093, to make provision for purchases of, or commitments to purchase, an industrial resource or a critical technology item for Government use or resale, and to make provision for the development of production capabilities, and for the increased use of emerging technologies in security program applications, and to enable rapid transition of emerging technologies.

(b)  Materials acquired under section 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093, that exceed the needs of the programs under the Act may be transferred to the National Defense Stockpile, if, in the judgment of the Secretary of Defense as the National Defense Stockpile Manager, such transfers are in the public interest.

Sec304.  Subsidy Payments.  To ensure the supply of raw or nonprocessed materials from high cost sources, or to ensure maximum production or supply in any area at stable prices of any materials in light of a temporary increase in transportation cost, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303(c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(c), to make subsidy payments, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of OMB.

Sec305.  Determinations and Findings.  (a)  Pursuant to budget authority provided by an appropriations act in advance for credit assistance under section 301 or 302 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, 2092, and consistent with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as amended (FCRA), 2 U.S.C. 661 et seq., the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority to make the determinations set forth in sections 301(a)(2) and 302(b)(2) of the Act, in consultation with the Secretary making the required determination under section 202 of this order; provided, that such determinations shall be made after due consideration of the provisions of OMB Circular A 129 and the credit subsidy score for the relevant loan or loan guarantee as approved by OMB pursuant to FCRA.

(b)  Other than any determination by the President under section 303(a)(7)(b) of the Act, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority to make the required determinations, judgments, certifications, findings, and notifications defined under section 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093, in consultation with the Secretary making the required determination under section 202 of this order.

Sec306.  Strategic and Critical Materials.  The Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of the Interior in consultation with the Secretary of Defense as the National Defense Stockpile Manager, are each delegated the authority of the President under section 303(a)(1)(B) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(a)(1)(B), to encourage the exploration, development, and mining of strategic and critical materials and other materials.

Sec307.  Substitutes.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303(g) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(g), to make provision for the development of substitutes for strategic and critical materials, critical components, critical technology items, and other resources to aid the national defense.

Sec308.  Government-Owned Equipment.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 303(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(e), to:

(a)  procure and install additional equipment, facilities, processes, or improvements to plants, factories, and other industrial facilities owned by the Federal Government and to procure and install Government owned equipment in plants, factories, or other industrial facilities owned by private persons;

(b)  provide for the modification or expansion of privately owned facilities, including the modification or improvement of production processes, when taking actions under sections 301, 302, or 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, 2092, 2093; and

(c)  sell or otherwise transfer equipment owned by the Federal Government and installed under section 303(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(e), to the owners of such plants, factories, or other industrial facilities.

Sec309.  Defense Production Act Fund.  The Secretary of Defense is designated the Defense Production Act Fund Manager, in accordance with section 304(f) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2094(f), and shall carry out the duties specified in section 304 of the Act, in consultation with the agency heads having approved, and appropriated funds for, projects under title III of the Act.

Sec310.  Critical Items.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 107(b)(1) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2077(b)(1), to take appropriate action to ensure that critical components, critical technology items, essential materials, and industrial resources are available from reliable sources when needed to meet defense requirements during peacetime, graduated mobilization, and national emergency.  Appropriate action may include restricting contract solicitations to reliable sources, restricting contract solicitations to domestic sources (pursuant to statutory authority), stockpiling critical components, and developing substitutes for critical components or critical technology items.

Sec311.  Strengthening Domestic Capability.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 107(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2077(a), to utilize the authority of title III of the Act or any other provision of law to provide appropriate incentives to develop, maintain, modernize, restore, and expand the productive capacities of domestic sources for critical components, critical technology items, materials, and industrial resources essential for the execution of the national security strategy of the United States.

Sec312.  Modernization of Equipment.  The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense, in accordance with section 108(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2078(b), may utilize the authority of title III of the Act to guarantee the purchase or lease of advance manufacturing equipment, and any related services with respect to any such equipment for purposes of the Act.  In considering title III projects, the head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense shall provide a strong preference for proposals submitted by a small business supplier or subcontractor in accordance with section 108(b)(2) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2078(b)(2).

PART IV  -  VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES

Sec401.  Delegations.  The authority of the President under sections 708(c) and (d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(c), (d), is delegated to the heads of agencies otherwise delegated authority under this order.  The status of the use of such delegations shall be furnished to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

Sec402.  Advisory Committees.  The authority of the President under section 708(d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(d), and delegated in section 401 of this order (relating to establishment of advisory committees) shall be exercised only after consultation with, and in accordance with, guidelines and procedures established by the Administrator of General Services.

Sec403.  Regulations.  The Secretary of Homeland Security, after approval of the Attorney General, and after consultation by the Attorney General with the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, shall promulgate rules pursuant to section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e), incorporating standards and procedures by which voluntary agreements and plans of action may be developed and carried out.  Such rules may be adopted by other agencies to fulfill the rulemaking requirement of section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e).

PART V  -  EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL

Sec501.  National Defense Executive Reserve.  (a) In accordance with section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), there is established in the executive branch a National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) composed of persons of recognized expertise from various segments of the private sector and from Government (except full time Federal employees) for training for employment in executive positions in the Federal Government in the event of a national defense emergency.

(b)  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue necessary guidance for the NDER program, including appropriate guidance for establishment, recruitment, training, monitoring, and activation of NDER units and shall be responsible for the overall coordination of the NDER program.  The authority of the President under section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), to determine periods of national defense emergency is delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(c)  The head of any agency may implement section 501(a) of this order with respect to NDER operations in such agency.

(d)  The head of each agency with an NDER unit may exercise the authority under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153, to employ civilian personnel when activating all or a part of its NDER unit.  The exercise of this authority shall be subject to the provisions of sections 501(e) and (f) of this order and shall not be redelegated.

(e)  The head of an agency may activate an NDER unit, in whole or in part, upon the written determination of the Secretary of Homeland Security that an emergency affecting the national defense exists and that the activation of the unit is necessary to carry out the emergency program functions of the agency.

(f)  Prior to activating the NDER unit, the head of the agency shall notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism of the impending activation.

Sec502.  Consultants.  The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c), to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations.  The authority delegated by this section may not be redelegated.

PART VI  -  LABOR REQUIREMENTS

Sec601.  Secretary of Labor.  (a)  The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:

(1)  collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal of the Nation's workforce needs for purposes of national defense;

(2)  upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;

(3)  upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order, consult with that agency with respect to:  (i) the effect of contemplated actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;

(4)  upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order:  (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs; and

(5)  develop and implement an effective labor management relations policy to support the activities and programs under this order, with the cooperation of other agencies as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the National Mediation Board, and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

(b)  All agencies shall cooperate with the Secretary of Labor, upon request, for the purposes of this section, to the extent permitted by law.

PART VII  -  DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT COMMITTEE

Sec701.  The Defense Production Act Committee.  (a)  The Defense Production Act Committee (Committee) shall be composed of the following members, in accordance with section 722(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171(b):

(1)   The Secretary of State;

(2)   The Secretary of the Treasury;

(3)   The Secretary of Defense;

(4)   The Attorney General;

(5)   The Secretary of the Interior;

(6)   The Secretary of Agriculture;

(7)   The Secretary of Commerce;

(8)   The Secretary of Labor;

(9)   The Secretary of Health and Human Services;

(10)  The Secretary of Transportation;

(11)  The Secretary of Energy;

(12)  The Secretary of Homeland Security; 

(13)  The Director of National Intelligence;

(14)  The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;

(15)  The Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers;

(16)  The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and

(17)  The Administrator of General Services.

(b)  The Director of OMB and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall be invited to participate in all Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role.  The Chairperson, as designated by the President pursuant to section 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171, may invite the heads of other agencies or offices to participate in Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role, as appropriate.

Sec702.  Offsets.  The Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and submit to the Congress the annual report required by section 723 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2172, in consultation with the Secretaries of State, the Treasury, Defense, and Labor, the United States Trade Representative, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other agencies as appropriate.  The heads of agencies shall provide the Secretary of Commerce with such information as may be necessary for the effective performance of this function.

PART VIII  -  GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec801.  Definitions.  In addition to the definitions in section 702 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2152, the following definitions apply throughout this order:

(a)  "Civil transportation" includes movement of persons and property by all modes of transportation in interstate, intrastate, or foreign commerce within the United States, its territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia, and related public storage and warehousing, ports, services, equipment and facilities, such as transportation carrier shop and repair facilities.  "Civil transportation" also shall include direction, control, and coordination of civil transportation capacity regardless of ownership.  "Civil transportation" shall not include transportation owned or controlled by the Department of Defense, use of petroleum and gas pipelines, and coal slurry pipelines used only to supply energy production facilities directly.

(b)  "Energy" means all forms of energy including petroleum, gas (both natural and manufactured), electricity, solid fuels (including all forms of coal, coke, coal chemicals, coal liquification, and coal gasification), solar, wind, other types of renewable energy, atomic energy, and the production, conservation, use, control, and distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of energy.

(c)  "Farm equipment" means equipment, machinery, and repair parts manufactured for use on farms in connection with the production or preparation for market use of food resources.

(d)  "Fertilizer" means any product or combination of products that contain one or more of the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for use as a plant nutrient.

(e)  "Food resources" means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption.  "Food resources" also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.

(f)  "Food resource facilities" means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer (excluding transportation thereof).

(g)  "Functions" include powers, duties, authority, responsibilities, and discretion.

(h)  "Head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense" means the heads of the Departments of State, Justice, the Interior, and Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the General Services Administration, and all other agencies with authority delegated under section 201 of this order.

(i)  "Health resources" means drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment required to diagnose, mitigate or prevent the impairment of, improve, treat, cure, or restore the physical or mental health conditions of the population.

(j)  "National defense" means programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity.  Such term includes emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5195 et seq., and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.

(k)  "Offsets" means compensation practices required as a condition of purchase in either government to government or commercial sales of defense articles and/or defense services as defined by the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq., and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 C.F.R. 120.1 130.17.

(l)  "Special priorities assistance" means action by resource departments to assist with expediting deliveries, placing rated orders, locating suppliers, resolving production or delivery conflicts between various rated orders, addressing problems that arise in the fulfillment of a rated order or other action authorized by a delegated agency, and determining the validity of rated orders.

(m)  "Strategic and critical materials" means materials (including energy) that (1) would be needed to supply the military, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States during a national emergency, and (2) are not found or produced in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet such need and are vulnerable to the termination or reduction of the availability of the material.

(n)  "Water resources" means all usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction of the United States, that can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements, except "water resources" does not include usable water that qualifies as "food resources."

Sec802.  General.  (a)  Except as otherwise provided in section 802(c) of this order, the authorities vested in the President by title VII of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2151 et seq., are delegated to the head of each agency in carrying out the delegated authorities under the Act and this order, by the Secretary of Labor in carrying out part VI of this order, and by the Secretary of the Treasury in exercising the functions assigned in Executive Order 11858, as amended.

(b)  The authorities that may be exercised and performed pursuant to section 802(a) of this order shall include:

(1)  the power to redelegate authorities, and to authorize the successive redelegation of authorities to agencies, officers, and employees of the Government; and

(2)  the power of subpoena under section 705 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2155, with respect to (i) authorities delegated in parts II, III, and section 702 of this order, and (ii) the functions assigned to the Secretary of the Treasury in Executive Order 11858, as amended, provided that the subpoena power referenced in subsections (i) and (ii) shall be utilized only after the scope and purpose of the investigation, inspection, or inquiry to which the subpoena relates have been defined either by the appropriate officer identified in section 802(a) of this order or by such other person or persons as the officer shall designate.

(c)  Excluded from the authorities delegated by section 802(a) of this order are authorities delegated by parts IV and V of this order, authorities in section 721 and 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2170 2171, and the authority with respect to fixing compensation under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153.

Sec803.  Authority.  (a)  Executive Order 12919 of June 3, 1994, and sections 401(3) (4) of Executive Order 12656 of November 18, 1988, are revoked.  All other previously issued orders, regulations, rulings, certificates, directives, and other actions relating to any function affected by this order shall remain in effect except as they are inconsistent with this order or are subsequently amended or revoked under proper authority.  Nothing in this order shall affect the validity or force of anything done under previous delegations or other assignment of authority under the Act.

(b)  Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 11858 of May 7, 1975, as amended, except as provided in section 802 of this order.

(c)  Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 12472 of April 3, 1984, as amended.

Sec804.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
         March 16, 2012.

 
Last Updated on Sunday, 25 March 2012 19:28
 

SHERROD BROWN EARNS "F" ON TAXES

E-mail Print PDF

 

Sherrod Brown Voting Record Nets "F" Grade From National Taxpayers Union
 
Tied For Worst Rating In U.S. Senate
 
Columbus, Ohio -- After analyzing 234 Senate roll call votes on taxes, spending and regulations, the National Taxpayers Union (NTU) gave Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown an “F” rating for voting the pro-taxpayer position only six percent (6%) of the time in 2011.
 
Brown tied two of his colleagues for the lowest taxpayer rating of any Senator. His F-rating also earned him NTU’s designation of “Big Spender."
 
“Since Sherrod Brown began his spending binge in Washington two decades ago our national debt has increased more than $11 trillion. If we want to change the out of control spending in Washington, we have to change who we send there. State Treasurer Josh Mandel has protected taxpayer money by cutting his office budget by more than a million dollars, returning $400,000 in unspent dollars to the state treasury, and earning Ohio the highest credit ratings possible for the funds he manages. As Senator, Josh Mandel will fight to balance the federal budget and stop the wasteful spending that is burying our children and grandchildren in debt.” – Travis Considine, Communications Director Josh Mandel For U.S. Senate

 

Treasurer Mandel's Record Of Success

Josh Mandel Protects Hard Earned Ohio Taxpayer Dollars. “‘As the chief watchdog of Ohio’s tax dollars, I feel a responsibility to root out fraud wherever I see,’ Mandel said. He described the allegations of fraud against the two banks as ‘an extreme breach of the public trust.’” (Alan Johnson, “Statewide pension funds drop two banks,” The Columbus Dispatch, 3/20/12)
  • “Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel severed contracts yesterday with two major banks that handled $41 billion in Ohio pension investments, accusing them of ‘systematically exploiting public pension funds and taxpayers.’” (Alan Johnson, “Statewide pension funds drop two banks,” The Columbus Dispatch, 3/20/12)
Josh Mandel Fulfills Campaign Pledge To Help End Fraud And Corruption. “’The pattern of fraud that has been detailed and alleged across the country against banks entrusted to safeguard funds for Ohio teachers, police, firefighters and retirees is an extreme breach of the public trust,’ Mandel said. ‘I have been fighting against abuse and corruption in banks that serve as international custodians for Ohio pension funds for the last two years, and as treasurer I feel that I have a duty to end custodial agreements with banks being sued for defrauding taxpayers.’” (Laura Bischoff, “Ohio claims fraud involved 2 East Coast banks,” Dayton Daily News, 3/19/12)
  • “His predecessor, Democrat Kevin Boyce, had hired the wife a State Street lobbyist as an office assistant. Mandel also questioned why Boyce would choose State Street less than a year after California’s attorney general sued the bank, accusing it of overcharging pension funds for foreign currency trades — the same practice DeWine is investigating.”(Joe Guillen, “Ohio treasurer ending relationships with 2 banks,” The Cleveland Plain Dealer, 3/19/12)
Josh Mandel Takes On Big Wall Street Banks. “The Ohio move is the first time a state publicly completely has severed ties with BNY Mellon amid the currency-trading investigations; previously, pension funds in Massachusetts and Los Angeles have restricted foreign-exchange trading with the bank.” (Matthias Rieker and Jean Eaglesham, “Ohio Cuts Ties With Mellon, State Street,” The Wall Street Journal, 3/19/12)

Mandel Overhauls The Treasurer’s Office To Save Ohio $1.2 Million. “[Mandel’s] changes helped produce a $400,000 surplus that Mandel returned to the state treasury at the end of the fiscal year on June 30. In addition, he projected an estimated $1.2 million savings in the current biennium.” (Alan Johnson, "Mandel Tightens Money Belt," The Columbus Dispatch, 07/12/11)     
  • Mandel Implements Electronic Bank Transfers, Which Will Save Ohio $100,000. “Until recently, a state treasurer employee was making a round trip to a Cleveland bank five days a week, transporting an average of $11million a day in checks written to the state of Ohio.  No more.  By converting to electronic deposits, the state is sparing taxpayers the cost and security risk of the weekday trips, plus an estimated $100,000 a year savings in check-processing and related fees and by gaining access to deposits more quickly, Treasurer Josh Mandel said.” (Alan Johnson, "Mandel Tightens Money Belt," The Columbus Dispatch, 07/12/11) 
  • 

Mandel Saves Ohio $30,000 By Disconnecting Unused Phone Lines. "The treasurer reported saving $30,000 annually by disconnecting unused phone, fax and mobile phone lines; $10,000 by lowering cellphone minutes; and $47,000 by consolidating regional offices." (Alan Johnson, "Mandel Tightens Money Belt," The Columbus Dispatch, 07/12/11)   


Mandel Maintains The Highest Rating Possible For STAR Ohio. "Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel said the state's STAR Ohio investment fund has maintained the highest possible rating, AAAm, from Standard & Poor’s rating agency. The fund is invested by the treasurer for contributing school districts and local governments." (Alan Johnson, "Ohio investment fund retains top rating while others are downgraded," The Columbus Dispatch, 09/08/11)
 
 
#   #   #
 
Last Updated on Monday, 09 April 2012 14:20
 

OCCUPY WALL STREET - UAW- SEIU

E-mail Print PDF

UAW Orchestrates, leads "99% Spring" effort, records show.

 

From April 9 to 15, “100,000 Americans will train for non-violent direct action,” promises a new website called “The 99% Spring.” But while the 43 organizations co-signing a letter on the ragtag-looking site indicate the sort of leaderless resistance characterized by the Occupy Wall Street movement, a series of files The Daily Caller downloaded from the United Auto Workers website indicate that the organized labor powerhouse is behind the effort.

The files, downloaded Sunday, include campaign talking points, a fill-in-the-blank press release template for participating organizations and an advance look at the social media campaign the organizers plan for Facebook and Twitter.

Also included is a “FYI” letter designed for endorsers to distribute, complete with a blank space at the top of the list of participating groups. Filling in a given organization’s name lends the impression that it, not the UAW, is the campaign’s driving force.

Google cache indicates that the files were available on an unprotected area of the UAW’s web server at least as early as February 16. They disappeared from public view Monday.

“The 99% Spring” name evokes the Occupy Wall Street movement, with its repeated division of Americans into the wealthy “1%” and the poorer “99%.”

UAW president Bob King endorsed the new campaign but has given no public indication that his union is behind it, or that the UAW is ready to publicly embrace the Occupy Wall Street movement’s “99%” rhetoric.

King, however, is decidedly in the figurative 1%. According to the Center for Union Facts, a non-profit organization that tracks organized labor through government documents, he earns $168,073 in salary and benefits.

Bolotsky’s online biography was deleted shortly after The Daily Caller contacted him for comment, and then restored after TheDC asked him to comment on its disappearance. It describes him as “an online organizer, blogger, comedic performer/writer and occasional voiceover artist, currently serving as New Media Coordinator for Agit-Pop Communications and its Other 98% Project, when not serving on the national leadership team of Living Liberally.”The “99% Spring” campaign’s social media plan document included a note from its creators. “If you’re having trouble grabbing the images, feel free to email us directly,” it said, before listing the email address of community organizer Josh Bolotsky.

Responding to questions about the campaign, Bolotsky insisted that it “isn’t actually a UAW campaign or project.” He said “an independent tech issue led to some docs, both public and private, appearing briefly on their site.”

Bolotsky named activists at the Movement Strategy Center and the New Organizing Institute who he said were “[t]he chief co-coordinators of the overall project.” But searches on those organizations’ websites turned up no mention of the “99% Spring” project at all.

Online records show that the campaign’s web domain was registered by MoveOn.org Political Action, the liberal PAC started by Berkeley Systems founder Wes Boyd and his wife. Boyd’s software company was best known for its “flying toaster” screensaver, and for the “You Don’t Know Jack” trivia game series.

The “current campaigns” link on the MoveOn.org PAC website leads to a page that also does not mention the “99% Spring” campaign.

Spokespersons for United Auto Workers and its president, Bob King, did not respond to requests for comment.

Follow David on Twitter

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/21/99-spring-campaign-led-by-uaw-computer-records-indicate/#ixzz1opUkUz7X

 

SEIU'S FALSE FRONT COMMUNITY GROUPS UNMASKED IN OCCUPY’S FRONT LINES

 1 day ago 15POST A COMMENT
A recent investigation by the Daily Caller has revealed that the Service International Employees Union--the fastest growing labor union in the United States, which spent $28 million in supporting Barack Obama get elected--have created a covert network of community organizing groups to support the Occupy movement. 

A Washington, D.C. law firm reportedly retained by SEIU helped incorporate the various community groups, and the listed corporate addresses for each group are tied back to local SEIU offices. 

According to the Caller, “The SEIU used the law firm of Trister, Ross, Schadler and Goldto legally incorporate many of the local community groups. The firm was responsible for incorporating the groups in Houston, Baltimore, Detroit, Philadelphia and Washington.Michael Trister, the firm’s principal partner, is a well-known labor lawyer. In 1998 he wrote a federal election law manual for union lawyers.” 

According to the Caller:

Incorporated by the SEIU as local non-profits, the groups are waging concerted local political campaigns to publicly attack conservative political figures, banks, energy companies and other corporations. 
Each local group has portrayed itself as an independent community organization not tied to any special interest. But they were founded, incorporated, and led by SEIU personnel. 
The individual activist groups use benign-sounding names including This Is Our DC; Good Jobs, Great Houston; Good Jobs, Better BaltimoreGood Jobs Now in DetroitFight for PhillyOne PittsburghGood Jobs LA; and Minnesotans for a Fair Economy
In reality, they are creations of the wealthy and influential labor union, amounting to a secret network of new SEIU front groups. One group in particular has gained significant attention in the nation’s capitol--“Our DC”--a name that suggests the group has local grassroots even though its legal address is in Gaithersburg, Md., which is the headquarters address of SEIU Local 500.
Reports indicate that some of the SEIU influence has occurred only a few blocks from where their national headquarters are based in Washington, D.C. in Dupont Circle. According to the Caller one of the groups--Our DC incited protestors at the Occupy CPAC rally in early February, and also sent 30 protestors to unlawfully assemble in the congressional office of Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell during the December “Take Back the Capitol” campaign
 

Apparently the campaign, which was promoted by Occupy DC was actually orchestrated by union officials. 

A Caller source said that during the protest African-American and Hispanic protestors occupied McConnell’s office two Caucasian women used laptop computers in the hallway to post messages on Twitter. The event was apparently reported through a website for “99% in DC,” and records from the Internet server dictate the group was apparently managed by SEIU--even though activists in the field denied any connection to the Occupy movement. 

The Caller explained:

The Daily Caller previously reported on a similar tactic employed in February by theUnited Auto Workers, which sought to distance itself from a “99% Spring” campaign scheduled for April. Planning documents described that union as one participant of many, even though the documents were being distributed from an unprotected portion of a UAW Web server
Many of the Internet domain names for the groups’ websites were originally registered through an anonymous proxy service. But records compiled by Robtex.com, a website reputation management firm, reveal that all of their IP (Internet Protocol) addresses link back to a main SEIU Web server.
An IP address is a unique number assigned to an Internet-connected computer or computer network. The principal IP address of the SEIU’s main Web server reveals an inventory of 69 Web domains representing union and advocacy groups throughout the United States. All of the sites corresponding to the city-specific SEIU front groups are on that server. 
Most of their websites have similar visual designs and appear to be based on the same template — a template that The Daily Caller was able to identify on an unprotected SEIU server.
The group participated in several protests and rallied including occupations of offices for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican Rep. Frank Wolf and House Speaker John Boehner as well as an “Occupy K Street” rally and the “National Day of Action for the 99%” which resulted in the closing of parts of the Francis Scott Key Bridgethat connects the District with Virginia. 
 

Video evidence captured at CPAC has revealed that an “Our DC” member was leading the charge with a megaphone and another video published by The Huffington Post revealed a massive “Occupy United” banner displayed by protestors waving similar 99% signs. 

The Caller investigation reported:

For example, the legal name of the Los Angeles group “Good Jobs LA,” is “Good Jobs, Safe Communities LA.” It is registered with the California Secretary of State at the Sacramento headquarters address of SEIU California. 
The street addresses listed on many of the websites themselves, however, do not correspond with SEIU locals. 
At least one of the websites, “One Pittsburgh,” provides a list of 14 “coalition partners,” including the NAACP, the Sierra Club, Clean Water Action, and locals of the United Food and Commercial Workers and an Ironworkers union affiliated with the AFL-CIO. The SEIU is among that list, making its role appear minor. 
The street addresses listed on many of the websites themselves, however, do not correspond with SEIU locals.
SEIU connected groups are tax exempt under their registered 501(c)(4) status, but contributions are not tax-deductible as they are with charitable 501(c)(3) organizations. The Caller summarized the irony of this story best when it opined, “While the Occupy movement abhors corporate secrecy, demanding that Wall Street firms and banks open their books, the new SEIU network is marked by a lack of transparency that runs afoul of best-practice standards established by the non-profit and philanthropic communities.”

Last Updated on Sunday, 18 March 2012 09:49
 

Wisconsin Success Story

E-mail Print PDF

AFP Town Hall Speech

Posted by Tim Nerenz on January 10, 2012 at 8:09pm

[I was invited to speak as a panelist at Americans For Prosperity "It's Working" Town Hall today in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Here is my closing speech]

 

Some of you may have read a piece I wrote recently, entitled “Downward Wisconsin”. It begins like this:

“We used to make things here in Wisconsin. We made machine tools in Milwaukee, cars in Kenosha and ships in Sheboygan. We mined iron in the north and lead in the south. We made cheese, we made brats, we made beer, and we even made the napkins to clean up the beer we spilled. And we made money.”

That essay was a celebration of the working men and women in Wisconsin and our great industrial entrepreneurs – those old geezers with beards whose family name was their guarantee to the world that the products made here were the best in the world.

I wasn’t a very good student in college, but I do remember this: there are only three ways to create wealth in this world – make it, mine it, or grow it. We used to do all three of those things here in Wisconsin.

Reality check: here are our top 10 employers in Wisconsin today:

Walmart, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Milwaukee Public Schools, U.S. Postal Service, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Menards, Marshfield Clinic, Aurora Health Care, City of Milwaukee, and Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs.

That is where a century of progressivism will get you. That and a $3.6 billion structural deficit.

In 2010, a survey of Wisconsin employers showed that only 10% thought we were headed in the right direction. We came into 2011 year ranked 44th in business climate, and 47th in new business formation. We are one of the 10 worst states in retention of our college graduates.

In just one year, Wisconsin has moved up to 24th in business climate, the largest single year jump ever recorded. 94% of employers now believe we are headed in the right direction.

What changed? Gee - I don’t recall.

A state budget that could not be balanced for a decade was balanced.

Taxes on businesses and business owners were reduced after a decade of increases.

A hostile regulatory posture was shifted back into neutral.

We quit throwing money at our failing government schools and finally tackled the root cause of our problems in education – Act 10 is working.

And so is Wisconsin. Our manufacturing companies are coming back strong. Wisconsin employers currently have 32,000 unfilled positions – jobs available but no one qualified or willing to take them. We are doing our job.

You may have read about the Wisconsin company that just signed a 5-year deal to build Chinese products here. Man bites dog.

That is our company; those are our factories and our employees; I’m just the guy who did the deal.

Do you know what Governor Walker and the State of Wisconsin did to help us get that deal done? Nothing. Perfect. Thank you, Scott Walker.

In fact, there was no government participation on either side. It took only two days to work out the details – amazing what you can get done without lawyers and bureaucrats helping.

We are not alone. There are thousands of terrific companies in Wisconsin. Those of us who still build things in Wisconsin are damn good at it. We don’t need government subsidies to succeed; we just need government to get out of our way. Get off our back; fix a bridge; go lay by your dish.

Why do 9 out of 10 employers think Wisconsin is headed on the right track? Because government IS getting out of our way. Wisconsin is open for business.

And yet, there are those in this state that don’t want Wisconsin to be open for business; they want to go right back to the way it was. At least I think that is what they want – I don’t speak drum.

Imagine what a chilling effect that would have upon the people who will make decisions about where to build their next factory, or open their next store or restaurant, or relocate their headquarters.

You can’t be for jobs and against the corporations that create them.

You can’t be for prosperity and against the things that make us prosper.

You can’t be for liberty and surrender yours to the state.

You can’t be for the working man and against his Right To Work.

There are tens of thousands of protesters and occupiers who have spent the last year insisting that theirs are the only voices who speak for the working man.

I have a message for them: I’m a working man. You don’t speak for me.

And there are 2,350,000 more of us who DON’T work for the government, and this is our state too.

It’s working, and we all need to get working to keep it that way.

Thank you.

[Note: when I accept invitations to speak, the opinions expressed are my own, not of my employer. Our company does not take positions on candidates or political parties.]

Last Updated on Friday, 13 January 2012 00:47
 

OHIO LIBERTY COUNCIL SPEAKS OUT ABOUT OBAMA APPOINTMENTS

E-mail Print PDF

 

Ohio Liberty Council

2531 Tiller Lane • Columbus, OH • 43231 • 740-837-4593 • 216-342-1147 (Fax)

 

PRESS RELEASE

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Thursday, January 5, 2012

 

 

OHIO LIBERTY COUNCIL REACTS TO OBAMA APPOINTMENTS

 

 

Columbus, Ohio -  The Ohio Liberty Council, speaking for it’s member liberty groups, reacted harshly to President Barack Obama’s appointment of Richard Cordray as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Board and his filling of three vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board Wednesday.  Tom Zawistowski, President of the OLC said in a statement, “Those of us in the liberty movement see the illegal and un-Constitutional actions by the President yesterday as a threat to the very future of our nation.  Either we are a nation of laws or we are not.  Either we follow the Constitution or we dissolve the union.  We call upon members of the Senate and the House, from both parties, to honor their oath of office and take every necessary action to protect and defend the Constitution against this illegal usurpation of power by the executive branch.”  

 

Zawistowski went on to say “The Consumer Financial Protection Board itself is un-Constitutional and the method by which this President choose to appoint its director and to take control of the National Labor Relations Board confirms the intent of this President to disregard the Constitution at every turn. The President swore an oath to “protect and defend” the Constitution and he has clearly reneged on that oath by these actions. If a President does not believe in the Constitution of the United States then he should resign, or be removed from office, because the vast majority of Americans do believe in the Constitution and are ready and willing to defend it.”

 

The Ohio Liberty Council is a council of leaders whose purpose is to unite conservative grassroots organizations for greater effectiveness in the state and nation, and to provide resources for member organizations to strengthen their groups. The OLC currently has over 75 liberty-minded groups across Ohio who are members of its coalition.

 

###

 

 

Thursday on Fox Business with Neal Cavuto, Ohio Congressman Bill Johnson announced that he would investigate taking legal action to stop President Obama appointments of Richard Cordray and the NLRB Board appointments made on Wednesday.  During the interview Cavuto suggested that if the President is found to have violated the Constitution that it would be an impeachable offense. Johnson replied by saying that he would follow the legal trail wherever it leads. You can watch the video at this link:

 

http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1368195456001/are-obamas-nlrb-recess-appointments-an-impeachable-offense/?playlist_id=87185

 
On Thursday morning Ohio Senate Candidate Josh Mandel had the opportunity to appear on "Fox & Friends" to discuss President Obama's recent speech in Ohio.  You can view that video at this link:
 
 

U.S. Senate Oath of Office:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Last Updated on Saturday, 03 March 2012 23:15
 

Wow: Ford ad blasts bailouts — and perhaps more

E-mail Print PDF

Is this just a business seeing a competitive edge against two of its rivals — or a political statement meant for wider purposes? Ford has a new ad series called “Press Conference,” in which sales staff escort a Ford buyer into a room supposedly to finalize paperwork but finds “reporters” and cameras on hand to ask why he or she bought a Ford. The responses are unscripted, according to US News and World Report, but the decision to publish this response while the nation still debates the auto bailouts might have some Obama supporters questioning the timing:

 

AS OBAMA PRETENDS AT ITS FREEDOM, HIS GOV'T PLANS TAKEOVER OF INTERNET

E-mail Print PDF

As Obama Pretends at Its Freedom, His Gov’t Plans Takeover of Internet

 

By Warner Todd Huston

  

Thursday, September 30, 2010

imageIn an address to the United Nations on Thursday, Sept. 23, President Obama pledged to preserve a “free and open Internet” and would call out nations that censored content.

In a veiled reference to China and other nations that censor the Internet, Obama said that a civil society fosters open government. “Civil society is the conscience of our communities, and America will always extend our engagement abroad with citizens beyond the halls of government. And we will call out those who suppress ideas and serve as a voice for those who are voiceless.”

 

“We will promote new tools of communication so people are empowered to connect with one another and, in repressive societies, to do so with security,” Obama said. “We will support a free and open Internet, so individuals have the information to make up their own minds. And it is time to embrace and effectively monitor norms that advance the rights of civil society and guarantee its expansion within and across borders.”

Yet even as Obama stood giving high sounding words to a “free and open Internet” and scolding other nations that have oppressive controls on Internet access for their own citizens, Barack Obama’s own government has itself been quietly making plans to take over the Internet from private companies.

Obama’s Federal Communications Commission Chairman, Julius Genachowski, has been angling to use telephone regulations from the 1930s to try and take over full control of the Internet.

One wonders how Obama can have the gall to claim that he wants a “free and open” Internet when he is trying to take control of it himself? How long would the Internet stay “free and open” once the federal government takes hold of it and begins to decide what will be allowed and not allowed over it’s infrastructure?

As always, Barack Obama talks out of both sides of his mouth claiming all at once that he is for open access, and promoting new technologies and businesses while at the same time making plans for Bi Government to control it all from Washington.

Henry Waxman (D, CA), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, also seems to be very confused about what is going on with the idea of the FCC grabbing control over the Internet.

On one day this week he wanted to introduce legislation that would put Congress in the driver’s seat on regulation thereby cutting out the FCC from regulating the Internet, but then the very next day he reversed himself 100% and decided it wouldn’t be a good idea. It is a bit hard to understand such a whiplash-inducing move but it has happened nonetheless.

Still, if Congress takes up a consideration of how to handle the Internet this should forestall the FCC’s attempts to forcibly take over the Internet via fiat regulation.

Anyone interested in keeping the government’s hands off the full control of the Internet should pressure Waxman to take up his original position.

Others that can put off the FCC’s power grab are Marsha Blackburn (R, TN) — who has come out in opposition to government control of the Internet — and Rep. Rick Boucher (D, VA), another member of Energy and Commerce Committee.

A good mode of pressure is to cite a new poll that says that the public is not in favor of the government take over of the Internet.

BroadbandforAmerica.com has an interesting report about a survey made by Hart Research Associates that seems to indicate that there is “substantial opposition to government Internet regulation.”

The survey shows that 75 percent oppose government regulation with 55 percent saying that government should not regulate the Internet at all.

In other words, respondents did not want the government saying how business should be conducted on the Internet and were reticent to agree that government should restrict or control Internet providers. Congress should be made aware of these facts.

canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/28227

 


Banner


 


Log in to see events and discussion.

Upcoming Events